Project Description
The City of Lakewood used their grant funds to divert the Bulky Item
Collection donations to reuse facilities; materials included construction and demolition debris, electronics, and
household bulky items. The project focused mainly on the residential
sector with disposal alternatives through the Bulky Item Collection system.
The City worked with the local hauler to divert the
collected materials to local charitable organizations in need of the
items, and diverted 67.5 tons on average per month for reuse purposes.
As indicated on their Work Statement, there were a total of three main
tasks, and related sub-tasks, to complete this project.
The steps required to accomplish their project are as follows:
Task 1.1: Identify Items for Reuse Activity. (Reimbursable Services)
City and Contracted Staff reviewed the list of items collected from the
City's Dial-A-Dump program from January through September 2003 to determine
which items would be targeted for the new Dial-A-Donation program. The list
did not provide any description as to the condition of the items collected
and the estimated 750 tons diversion per year was based on the types of
materials that could reasonably be recovered if in good working condition.
Task 1.1 is 100 percent complete.
Task 1.2: Software Program to Track Reuse Items. (Reimbursable
Services)
The City's franchised hauler installed new software to track items collected
under the bulky item collection program. Items are tracked based on type of
item (e.g., couch, table, Queen mattress) and if the item is functional or
not functional. A summary of the items collected is provided at the end of
each month.
Task 1.2 is 100 percent complete.
Task 1.3: Sort Collected Items. (Matching Services)
Each day, the driver takes the day's dispatch tickets, which note which
items are slated for reuse. The City has found that many times, the items on
the dispatch ticket do not match the items at the curb and that there are
new items out for pickup. The driver makes note of what items are actually
collected, but no changes were made to the system until April 2005.
Therefore, the totals below are the totals that were called in, but not
necessarily picked up. In order to calculate the amount of scavenging
occurring, staff reconciled a random sampling of tickets and found that
about half of the reusable items on the tickets were replaced with new
items. The City assumes, therefore, that the majority of the items that are
truly reusable or easily repairable are being collected by scavengers and so
there is little left for the hauler to collect for reuse.
| Month |
Total # of
Items
Called In |
Total #
Reusable
Items Called In |
Percent
Reusable
Called In |
| Jan. 2004 |
1,979 |
417 |
21% |
| Feb. 2004 |
1,887 |
245 |
13% |
| Mar. 2004 |
2,855 |
415 |
14% |
| Apr. 2004 |
2,913 |
326 |
11% |
| May 2004 |
2,809 |
211 |
7% |
| Jun. 2004 |
3,025 |
137 |
4% |
| Jul. 2004 |
2,965 |
140 |
5% |
| Aug. 2004 |
3,043 |
117 |
4% |
| Sep. 2004 |
2,459 |
87 |
4% |
| Oct. 2004 |
2,206 |
71 |
3% |
| Nov. 2004 |
2,316 |
60 |
3% |
| Dec. 2004 |
1,751 |
39 |
2% |
| Jan. 2005 |
2,184 |
65 |
3% |
| Feb. 2005 |
1,999 |
72 |
4% |
| Mar. 2005 |
2,500 |
104 |
4% |
| Apr. 2005 |
2,251 |
79 |
4% |
| Total |
39,142 |
2,585 |
7% |
From the table above, it is apparent that at best, seven percent of the
items to be picked up were deemed to be reusable by the owner at the time of
the appointment. If half are being scavenged, then only about 3 and a half
percent are actually available for reuse through this program. An item of
note from the above table is the decrease in items deemed to be reusable by
residents about five months after the program started. Form the audit, the
City found that many residents were calling other organizations to donate
their items prior to calling Dial-A-Dump. The City believes that this
increase in calls to reuse organizations can be attributed to the outreach
done at the beginning of the program to encourage residents to call
elsewhere and use Dial-A-Dump as a last resort.
The main highlight of this program was the collection of mattresses that
were donated to a company that makes and sells remanufactured mattresses.
Unfortunately, this is the only company of its kind in the vicinity and the
market for mattresses is inconsistent, so not all of the mattresses
collected by this program could be diverted. Two hundred ninety mattresses
were collected during the grant term. This portion of the program will
continue, as long as there is a market for the mattresses.
| Month |
Mattresses
Collected
for Reuse |
Month |
Mattresses
Collected
for Reuse |
| Jan. 2004 |
15 |
Sep. 2004 |
22 |
| Feb. 2004 |
19 |
Oct. 2004 |
15 |
| Mar. 2004 |
27 |
Nov. 2004 |
16 |
| Apr. 2004 |
34 |
Dec. 2004 |
8 |
| May 2004 |
27 |
Jan. 2005 |
23 |
| Jun. 2004 |
15 |
Feb. 2005 |
15 |
| Jul. 2004 |
13 |
Mar. 2005 |
12 |
| Aug. 2004 |
18 |
Apr. 2005 |
11 |
| Total = 122 |
Task 1.3 is 100 percent complete.
Task 1.4: Coordinate Collection with Reuse Organizations.
(Reimbursable Services)
The city's hauler continues to use the contact list to coordinate pickups
with the various organizations. The list is included on the city's Web site,
www.lakewoodcity.org/r3, to encourage residents to contact the
organizations directly in the future. The City will keep this list available
after the grant term ends.
A positive byproduct of this program is that organizations now call both
the City and the hauler to find out if there are particular items available
for donation. The City has also found that residents are starting to call
various organizations first and will donate their items prior to calling
Dial-A-Dump. Task 1.4 is 100 percent complete.
Task 2.1: Create Reuse Pamphlet. (Reimbursable Services)
A four-page brochure was created to promote the City's program. This
brochure has been distributed to residents when a bulky item pickup has
occurred, and is available at City Hall and at all community events where
Public Works staff has been present.
Task 2.1 is 100 percent complete.
Task 2.2: Printing Reuse Pamphlet. (Reimbursable Services)
Task 2.2 is 100 percent complete.
Task 2.3: Write and Submit Newspaper Articles. (Reimbursable Services)
An article was written for inclusion in the City's recycling guide,
published at the end of October 2004. Based on the recent publication of the
guide, staff did not pursue a second article for publication. The items that
have been produced are still in circulation and are used consistently to
promote awareness of the program. In addition, the City's e-newsletter often
contains a reminder message about the donation aspect of the Dial-A-Dump
program. Task 2.3 is 100 percent complete.
Task 2.4: Develop Flyer for Reuse Stores. (Reimbursable Services)
This task was incorporated in to Task 2.1.
Task 2.5: Printing of Flyer. (Reimbursable Services)
This task was incorporated in to Task 2.2.
Task 2.6: Participate in Community Events. (Reimbursable Services)
In the original scope for this project, it was estimated that staff would
attend ten community events over the course of the grant term. However,
there were only four events where recycling and other environmental topics
were appropriate for promotion. The summary is as follows:
| Event |
Date |
Participants |
| Pan American Fiesta |
May 8-9, 2004 |
400 |
| Public Safety Expo |
June 5, 2004 |
163 |
| Summer Stampede |
June 12, 2004 |
120 |
| Earth Day Celebration |
April 23, 2005 |
350 |
Task 2.6 is 100 percent complete.
Task 3.1: Manage Funds. (Matching Services)
City staff has created a separate budget item in the City's budget to track
the finances of this program. Task 3.1 is 100 percent complete.
Task 3.2: Planning, Tracking Milestones, Record Keeping. (Reimbursable
Services)
City staff performed an audit of the city's contracted hauler to evaluate
the process used to collect information about the items to be collected
under the bulky item program and make modifications to improve the program.
The program was evaluated under three phases: initial call by resident,
collection of items, and contact with reuse organizations.
Initial Call
From the audit, it appears that the initial call by the resident is well
handled by the contracted hauler's customer service staff. The customer
service representative asks the resident the type and quantity of each item
to be collected, as well as the functionality of the item - if it is
reusable, repairable, or is truly a discard. The driver is then given a
dispatch ticket with information regarding the items at the residence to be
collected.
Collection of Items
From the audit, it was discovered that more often than not, the items at the
residence are not the same as what is on the dispatch ticket. Staff believes
that scavengers are taking the majority of the reusable or repairable items
and leaving the discards. The driver does make note of which items were
missing and if they were replaced with something else, although there has
been no tracking of what is on the ticket compared to what was actually at
the residence. Therefore, it is difficult to estimate the amount of material
being diverted by the program. Staff is working with the hauler to make
changes to the software in order to reconcile the collections in order to
accurately reflect what was at the residence and what was collected for
reuse or recycling in order to estimate program diversion totals.
Contact with Reuse Organizations
There have been some difficulties with timely coordination between the
contracted hauler and the reuse organizations. The hauler has not been
contacting the organizations on a routine schedule, claiming that most items
cannot be reused. The hauler claims that the only items being sent for reuse
at this time are mattresses. Staff will continue to work with the hauler to
contact existing program partners and locate new partners and to facilitate
coordination of collection activities. Task 3.2 is 100 percent complete.
Task 3.3: Submission of Monthly Progress Reports. (Matching Services)
Due to difficulties in obtaining information on items slated for reuse,
monthly progress reports have not been completed. Contracted staff continues
to work with the City's hauler to provide program totals. Task 3.3 is 100 percent complete.
Task 3.4: Submit Final Report to CIWMB. (Matching Services)
Task 3.4 8s 100 percent complete.
Submitted by Michelle Nicholls, Solid Waste Consultant
May 10, 2005
*Permission was obtained from grant recipient to publish project profile.
Back to Top
|
FY
2002/2003 Recipients
| FY 2003/2004
Recipients | Reuse Home
|