|
Regulations Home
Search Regulations
Title 14 Home
Title 27 Home
Article 3
Definitions
Section 18720
Article 6.1
Solid Waste Generation Studies and Solid Waste Disposal
Characterization
Section 18722-18726
Article 6.2
Source Reduction and Recycling Elements
Section 18730-18748
Article 6.3
Household Hazardous Waste Elements
Section 18750-18751.8
Article 6.4
Non-disposal Facility Element
Section 18752-18754.5
Article 6.5
Siting Elements
Section 18755-18756.7
Article 6.6
Countywide and Regional Agency Integrated Waste Management Plans
Section 18757-18758
Article 7
Procedures for Preparing and Revising City, Regional Agency and
County Source Reduction and Recycling Elements, and Household Hazardous Waste Elements and
City and County Non-disposal Facility Elements
Section 18760-18775.4
Article 8
Procedures for Preparing and Revising Siting Elements, Summary
Plans, and Countywide and Regional Agency Integrated Waste Management Plans
Section 18776-18791
Article 9.0
Annual Report Regulations
Section 18794.0-18794.5
Article 9.1
Adjustment Method for Calculating Changes in Waste Generation Tonnage
Section 18797.0-18797.4
Article 9.2
Disposal Reporting System
Section 18800-18807
Section 18808,
18809,
18810, 18811,
Section 18812-18814
Article 9.3
Repealed
Appendix 1.
General Guidelines for Sampling When Performing a Quantitative Field Analysis for a Solid Waste Generation Study (CIWMB, November 1990).
|
|
Regulations: Title 14, Natural Resources Division 7, CIWMB
Chapter 9. Planning Guidelines and Procedures for Preparing and Revising
Countywide and Regional Agency Integrated Waste Management Plans
|
|
Appendix 1. General Guidelines for Sampling When Performing a Quantitative Field
Analysis for a Solid Waste Generation Study (CIWMB - November 1990).
1. Sampling Solid Waste Generation, Diversion and Disposal - Perform these tasks in the following order:
(a) Identify the Populations.
In each jurisdiction, identify: the populations of (1)
residential units, commercial units, industrial sites, and other sites of solid waste
generation; (2) facilities and programs which recycle, compost, or source reduce solid
wastes; and (3) solid waste transfer stations, and permitted solid waste transformation
facilities and solid waste disposal sites. For the purposes of these Guidelines, a
population is the aggregate from which a sample is chosen, and refers to the aggregate
number of solid waste generators, solid waste diversion facilities and programs, or solid
waste transfer, transformation and disposal facilities identified by a jurisdiction.(b) Stratify the Populations (Optional Step).
Stratify each identified population into distinct
subpopulations. The jurisdiction shall select the subpopulations. For example, to stratify
the population for a solid waste diversion characterization, the jurisdiction could
stratify the population of recycling facilities into the following subpopulations:
drop-off centers, buy-back centers, and thrift shops. If the number of units in the
subpopulation(s) is small, the jurisdiction may choose not to stratify the population, and
instead choose a sample from the population as a whole.
(c) Random Sampling.
Assign a unique number to each identified unit of a population
or subpopulation. Using a random numbers table or any other unbiased sampling method,
choose the units to be sampled in the population or subpopulation, for each season
identified by a jurisdiction. State the type(s) of unbiased sampling methods used in the
solid waste generation study, when the study is submitted to the Board as a part of the
SRR Element.

2. Sampling and Variability Determination: In order to determine the minimum number of samples to be taken from a
population or subpopulation, a jurisdiction may use one of the following two methods:
(a) Klee and Carruth Method. Perform these tasks as follows:
(i) Sample, according to the
requirements of Sections 18722, 18724 and 18726 of this Article, all of the solid waste
generated, all of the solid waste diverted from disposal by recycling, composting or
source reduction activities, and all of the solid waste transformed and disposed, for each
identified population or subpopulation.
(ii) To determine the number of samples required for a statistically
representative sampling from each population or subpopulation, the jurisdiction shall use
the formula for normal approximation which is found in: A.J. Klee and D. Carruth,
"Sample Weights in Solid Waste Composition Studies," American Society of Civil
Engineers Journal of the Sanitary Engineering Division, volume 96(SA4), pages 945-954,
August 1970, which is incorporated by reference.
This formula is:

A 90% confidence level shall be used in
this formula. Thus at 90% confidence level, z = 1.645 and s = 0.1632,
where z is the normal standard deviate (one-tailed) for the confidence level
desired and s is the estimated standard deviation of the sample, transformed
(arcsin) basis.
A jurisdiction shall use these values
for z and s in computing the minimum number of samples. A jurisdiction
shall select the confidence interval and confidence width to be used in computing the
minimum number of samples, i.e., the jurisdiction shall determine the d (small
delta) value to use in the formula.
In order to determine d, a
jurisdiction shall estimate its percent waste composition (x) by use of
existing published data (waste category, and waste type if available) about the
jurisdiction, and/or published data on percent waste composition from other jurisdictions.
The source of the value of X used in the solid waste generation study shall be stated in
the solid waste generation study.
Next, a jurisdiction shall select a
level of precision or sensitivity (^) (large delta) (e.g., 1%, 2%, 3%) concomitant with
its need for a given level of precision, with its population, and with the funds it has
available for the solid waste generation study, as determined by the jurisdiction.
The waste category occurring in the
highest percent in the selected waste stream shall be selected as the waste category for
determining x and computing d.
(iii) All solid waste generation studies
prepared using the Klee and Carruth Method for the purposes of meeting the requirements of
the Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989, as amended, and otherwise approved by the
Board, shall be considered to meet the requirements of this Article.
(b) American Society of Testing Materials (ASTM) Method.
(i) Sample, according to the requirements of Sections 18722, 18724 and
18726 of this Article, all of the solid waste generated, all of the solid waste diverted
from disposal by recycling, composting or source reduction activities, and all of the
solid waste transformed and disposed, for each identified population or subpopulation in
the jurisdiction.(ii) A jurisdiction shall use Section 9 and Table D of Draft No. 4 of
the proposed ASTM "Method for Determination of the Composition of Unprocessed
Municipal Solid Waste", dated January 24, 1990, which is incorporated by reference. A
jurisdiction may also use the values for s and x in Table C of this
Method, or may use values for s and x found in published solid waste
characterization studies which were conducted in California subsequent to 1984. Other
sections of this Method may be used with Section 9 and Table D. Once a final version of
this Method is adopted by ASTM, that Method shall become the approved method for
compliance with this Article.
All solid waste generation studies prepared using the Draft ASTM Method
for the purposes of meeting the requirements of the Integrated Waste Management Act of
1989, as amended, and otherwise approved by the Board, shall be considered to meet the
requirements of this Article.

3. Sort and Identify.
Sort and identify the solid wastes from each population and/or
subpopulation, using the sources of waste generation listed in Section 18722(i) of this
Article, and the waste categories and waste types listed in Section 18722(j) of this
Article.
4. Assignment of Waste Category and Waste Type.
Assign each identified solid waste material to one of the waste
categories and waste types listed in Sections 18722 (j) of this Article, or to any
additional waste types which a jurisdiction chooses to add to the list of waste types in
section (j) of this Article.
5. Volume or Weight Measurement.
Measure the volume or weight of each solid waste material that has been identified.
6. Tabulate and Analyze Data.
Perform these tasks in the following order. Tabulate and analyze
all data compiled about the waste categories and waste types. As a part of the analysis, a
jurisdiction shall compute (a) and (b) as follows:
(a) Determination of Mean and Variability.
Compute the sample mean (x) for volume or weight for each waste category and waste type identified.
Note, x = Exi/n, where xi
is a sample weight or volume and n is the total number of samples taken in the population
or subpopulation sampled.
Next, compute the variance (s2; i.e.,where s2 = E(xi
- x)2/n-1) and the standard deviation of the mean (s), for volume or weight measurement
for each population and subpopulation, using the following formula:
(Graphic here, not reproduced in this format)
(b) Set Confidence Levels for Sample Mean.
Set a 90% confidence level around the sample mean (x), for each
waste category and waste type identified.
Use the formula:

where tn-1
is the t value taken from the Student's t test values in Table 1, and where (n-1) is the
degrees of freedom for the Student's t test for a 90% confidence level.
Note: This formula is used to establish a confidence interval for a
population mean when the population variance is unknown. This formula is found in: M.
Woodward and L.M.A. Francis. 1988. Statistics for Health Management and Research, Section
7.4.3, pgs. 161-162. London: Edward Arnold Publishers, which is incorporated by reference.

7. Data Analysis Adjustment.
The data analysis conducted in steps 1 through 6 may be adjusted to
include waste categories and waste types which:
(a) are known, by current written
records held by the solid waste recycling, composting, source reduction, transformation or
disposal facilities, to be disposed or diverted in a jurisdiction or in permitted solid
waste facilities used by a jurisdiction, and
(b) may otherwise have been overlooked in the random sampling procedure.
TABLE
1
Student's t Values* |
Number
of
Samples (n) |
Degrees
of
Freedom (n-1) |
90% Confidence
Level |
|
|
|
| 2 |
1 |
6.314 |
| 3 |
2 |
2.920 |
| 4 |
3 |
2.353 |
| 5 |
4 |
2.132 |
| 6 |
5 |
2.015 |
| 7 |
6 |
1.943 |
| 8 |
7 |
1.895 |
| 9 |
8 |
1.860 |
| 10 |
9 |
1.833 |
| 11 |
10 |
1.812 |
| 12 |
1 |
1.796 |
| 13 |
12 |
1.782 |
| 14 |
13 |
1.771 |
| 15 |
14 |
1.761 |
| 16 |
15 |
1.753 |
| 17 |
16 |
1.746 |
| 18 |
17 |
1.740 |
| 19 |
18 |
1.734 |
| 20 |
19 |
1.729 |
| 21 |
20 |
1.725 |
| 22 |
21 |
1.721 |
| 23 |
22 |
1.717 |
| 24 |
23 |
1.714 |
| 25 |
24 |
1.711 |
| 26 |
25 |
1.708 |
| 27 |
26 |
1.706 |
| 28 |
27 |
1.703 |
| 29 |
28 |
1.701 |
| 30 |
29 |
1.699 |
| 31 |
30 |
1.697 |
| 36 |
35 |
1.690 |
| 41 |
40 |
1.684 |
| 46 |
45 |
1.679 |
| 51 |
50 |
1.676 |
| 61 |
60 |
1.671 |
| 71 |
70 |
1.667 |
| 81 |
80 |
1.664 |
| 91 |
90 |
1.662 |
| 101 |
100 |
1.660 |
| 121 |
120 |
1.658 |
| 141 |
140 |
1.656 |
| 161 |
160 |
1.654 |
| 189 |
188 |
1.653 |
| 201 |
200 |
1.653 |
| oo |
oo |
1.645 |
*Source:
George Savage, Draft ASTM Method, ASTM Designation DXXXX XX, Table D, January 1990,
Philadelphia, PA: American Society of Testing Materials.
Note:
Authority cited:
Sections 40502 and 41824 of the Public Resources Code.
Reference:
Sections 41030, 41031, 41032, 41033, 41300, 41330, 41331, 41332, 41333, 41780 and
41781 of the Public Resources Code.

Title 14 Home |
Regulations Home |