California Integrated Waste Management Board

 

Partnership 2000 Home

Annual Conference

History

Work Groups

Current Steering Committee

New Initiatives

LEA Central

Partnership 2000

Nuance of Nuisances Panel:  Odors

 

odor3tn.jpg (12480 bytes)

odor2tn.jpg (10799 bytes)

odor1tn.jpg (10357 bytes)
Problem Solving Panel

Interest Based Conflict Management Process from LEA/CIWMB Conference 1999:

Panel Members: CIWMB- Laura Niles, LEA- Patty Webb, LEA- Bill Prinz, Industry- Melissa St. John (Potrero Hills Landfill)

Raise Issues - Odors are a common complaint. Utilize effective tools, agency responsibility (state and local), operator responsibility. What triggers LEA reaction: public complaints, LEA judgement. Clarify definitions: "complaint", "odor", "nuisance". How do you draw the line between waste issues and Air Resources Board (ARB) issues?

Issue Statements - (1) At what point does odor become an issue for the LEA?  (2) How can LEA and Operators work together to resolve issues relating to odor given the issue of jurisdiction?

Discover Interests - Shared: Non-duplicative enforcement, public relations, future entitlements, political pressure, health risks, preventative approaches. Different: Level playing field vs. credit for compliance, cost effective solutions, take LEA out go to ARB. Conflicting: LEA duty.

Generate Options - Create another state agency to handle odor: "STINCO" (state team investigating complaints on odor); get AQMD involved: determine jurisdiction, advice; coordinate site visit of involved agencies, one voice to operator; MOU with Air Resources Board to establish referral policy; establish uniform state guidance; take over all nuisance complaints through legislation; develop local ordinances to establish authority; overturn 1220; give nuisance complaints to another co-agency code enforcement; Put in Conditional Use Permit (CUP); lower property taxes of affected residents; form team: operator, LEA, AQMD joint investigation; legislation to take back authority over odor and all SWF; agree on self motivating program; agree on how to investigate sources of odor; use of odor control chemicals; be willing to discuss cost effective solutions; allow operator to decide who to deal with, contingent on compliance; alter operations according to environmental conditions; purchase property; public forums; hire a consultant to investigate; public education programs; use of deodorants or other cover materials; verify the source of the odor.

Agreed upon Solutions - The Panel agreed on several short, long, and very long term goals. Short-term goals: A team approach should be taken when verifying source, including the operator, LEA and AQMD.   The operator will then alter operations according to finding. A communication and public involvement protocol should be established. Enforcement should be taken as necessary. Long-term: Develop an MOU to establish uniform guidance with the Air Resources Board that details a method of evaluation, complaint protocol, team approach,and enforcement options. Long-long-term: Legislation

Return to Problem Solving Panels

 

Last updated: October 26, 2007


Partnership 2000 http://www.ciwmb.ca.gov/Part2000/
Melissa Hoover-Hartwick: mhoover@ciwmb.ca.gov  (916) 341-6813