California Integrated Waste Management Board

 

List of 53 Landfills

Background

Landfill Study Home

Landfill Facility Compliance Study

Holtville Disposal Site: In-Depth Information

CIWMB’s Solid Waste Information System (SWIS) number: 13-AA-0006
Site Information per Landfill Facility Compliance Study (Task 2)

Information Source: Owner/Operator—Imperial County Public Works Department
E-mail response: March 24, 2004

The owner is not aware of the site being placed under a corrective action program (CAP) or issued a water-related clean-up and abatement Order (CAO) since development of the database (January 1, 1998). The owner has been directed to prepare an evaluation monitoring program (EMP), which has been submitted to the regional water control board (RWQCB) for review/approval, but no decision has been made. There have been no problems implementing existing groundwater related regulations at this site. The owner’s consultant intends to negotiate with the RWQCB to reduce efforts and cost associated with this site over the next three years. However, the owner indicated that budget constraints, due to the internal system of revenue generation, have limited activity at the site.

Regarding landfill gas, the owner is not aware of receiving any violations from the enforcement agency (EA). No additional gas-related protection measures have been implemented at this site beyond regulatory minimums. Quarterly monitoring of gas probes is ongoing, and the owner does not have any issues with current regulations.

There have been no leachate control issues at the site. Holtville is located in an arid desert region that annually averages 3 inches of precipitation per year. The site generates little or no leachate. At one point several years ago, the site had operational drainage ponding in a localized area, but this was addressed with minor grading. There are no surface water features adjacent or nearby the landfill. No drainage, erosion control, or surface water protection measures have been implemented beyond regulatory minimums. There have been no problems implementing the existing regulations at this site.

The only air quality measures taken at the site are periodic watering of roads and the operations area to control dust in accordance with the plan established by the air pollution control district (APCD). The facility has not received any notices to comply (NTC) or notices of violation (NOV) from the APCD. No additional protection measures are being implemented, and there have been no problems implementing existing air quality regulations at this site.

Information Source: Colorado River Basin Regional Water Quality Control Board
E-mail response: April 2, 2004

A CAO is being drafted for a groundwater release of volatile organic compounds (VOC) 1,1 Dichloroethane and chloroform, which occurred in 2002. The owner submitted an EMP work plan pursuant to Title 27 regulations on October 25, 2002, after performing a discrete retest to confirm the release.

Information Source: Enforcement Agency—Imperial County Department of Health Services, Division of Environmental Health
Telephone conversation: March 11, 2004
E-mail response: April 26, 2004

The site is a “trickling waste” facility located on the fringe of four different populated areas. At one time this site was a convenient disposal location for people before the area began to grow. These types of “trickling waste” sites are typically down to accepting 3 to 15 tons of waste per day. Local hauling and curbside pickup has significantly reduced the volume going to the site. The interviewee indicated that today a transfer station to serve the communities probably makes more sense than operating a local MSW landfill.

Average rainfall in the area is about 3 to 3.5 inches per year, and occurs in 3 or 4 events per year. The area has a very high evaporation rate.

The interviewee stated that the owner has indicated satisfaction with the waste discharge requirement (WDR) and reporting requirements. The interviewee has no issues with the existing regulatory requirements. Although landfill gas monitoring at the surface has not detected landfill gas, recent groundwater retesting at the Holtville Disposal Site reflects an increase in VOCs. The continued occurrences of VOCs in groundwater may be attributed to lateral migration of landfill gas. The RWQCB is currently evaluating this issue.

Information Source: Imperial County Air Pollution Control District
E-mail response: April 5, 2004

There have not been any notices to comply or notices of violation issued to the Holtville Disposal Site. This landfill has no facility for the destruction of landfill gases. The existing regulations do not require the destruction of methane, which is a greenhouse gas.

As defined in the Title 27, California Code of Regulations, a site is considered a trickling waste site “if the average annual waste disposal rate … is reduced for two consecutive years to a rate equal to or less than 30 percent of the average annual tonnage rate during the previous 10 years (exclusive of the minimum and maximum tonnage years)” (section 21110 [b][2]). By this definition, the CIWMB has considered this site to be a “trickling waste” site.

List of Landfills

 

Last updated: November 08, 2007


Landfill Facility Compliance Study http://www.ciwmb.ca.gov/Landfills/ComplyStudy/
Bobbie Garcia: bgarcia@ciwmb.ca.gov (916) 341-6291