|
|
"Innovations" Case Studies: Mini Trash Bins Local Government, Funding, and Tips |
|
|
Table of Contents
What Local Government Can DoState and local recycling requirements have helped lay the groundwork for many of the mini trash bin programs now in place. Ontario’s program grew out of the province’s 50 percent recycling goal. In California, the State requires all jurisdictions to recycle 50 percent of their trash according to the California Integrated Waste Management Act (AB 939, Sher, Chapter 1095, Statutes of 1989 as amended [IWMA]). This spurred San Jose’s program. In Spencer County, Ind., the program was facilitated by the local county commission passing an ordinance mandating recycling in county buildings. The City of San Jose’s Recycle At Work program, which encompasses the mini trash bin system, is an opportunity for the city to lead by example. The city has found that the program is helping overcome reluctance of some businesses to begin a recycling program by showing how a mini trash bin program can be successful on a large scale. Local government can take other steps to facilitate program success in public sector programs. In San Jose and Oakland, for instance, a memo from the city manager set the policy for recycling at city facilities. San Jose city staff did additional work with the city’s in-house print shop to ensure the stocking of paper that could be recycled and that contains postconsumer content. Funding MechanismsFunding for mini bin trash programs typically comes from the same source of funds that pay for recycling and trash services. In San Jose, for example, funding comes from the Integrated Waste Management Fund. This is an enterprise type of fund that receives money from various sources including IWMA fees levied on commercial generators and city facilities for waste generation. Challenges and Opportunities in ImplementationThe biggest challenge in implementing a mini trash bin program is getting employees to buy into the concept. Some think it is okay to carry recyclables to a central location, but not their trash. Some people think the bin is too small. Program critics tend to be in the minority. Recycling coordinators in the United States and Canada have all been confronted with surprise, negative reactions, and disbelief when introducing the mini trash bin. Comments such as “you expect me to fit all my trash in THAT?” are common. However, as soon as people realize they can recycle so many more materials, they realize they do not need a bigger trash can. They settle down when they begin to realize the mini trash bin is sufficient. Employees learn that they need only empty their mini trash bins once a week or once every two weeks (unless they put unwrapped food waste in it.) One office worker generates so little trash that she doesn’t need a mini trash bin on her desk. Despite smooth implementation, great employee acceptance, and overwhelming success, mini trash bin program coordinators reveal some people still complain about having to empty their own mini trash bins. They are in a distinct minority. Coordinators try to help “complainers” by pointing out the actions they may already be taking to reduce waste (such as writing notes on the back of once-used paper or sending e-mail instead of writing a note using paper). They point out to these employees that they already pass by the central collection bins a few times a day, so carrying their paper recycling bin or mini trash can with them once a week is not really much extra work. They keep focused on the positive. If an employee is not participating correctly in the City of Oakland’s program, custodial workers are supposed to leave a note on that person’s chair indicating the noncompliance by checking the appropriate box on the preprinted note. Custodial workers were reluctant to play the “heavy” until a custodian suggested leaving a “love note.” This is basically a thank-you to those who are participating well. From custodians’ perspective, they get blamed for everything. The “love note” is a way for them to give positive messages too. At the beginning of San Jose’s program, some people tried to hide and keep their conventional trash cans. However, no major problems have arisen since then. Virtually everyone now participates. In Kalamazoo County, most of the 800-plus employees quickly supported the idea-not only because it made collection of recyclables and trash more efficient, but also because it promised to reduce vermin problems caused by the availability of food waste at individual desks. Employees’ concern for a clean work site overrode anticipated concerns, such as cutting into custodians’ union-protected tasks, and employees managing their own wastes (“my job is ___, not emptying my recycling and trash”). One benefit of mini trash bin programs is that they can help employees who previously did not recycle to begin recycling, because no one is supporting their bad habit. In Kalamazoo County, non-recycling employees began to participate to avoid having their trash pile up. By getting individuals to take responsibility for their trash, mini trash bin programs are opportunities to change behavior. Tips for Replication
The picture below shows centralized containers for trash and recyclable bottles and cans.
|
|||
|
Last updated: October 26, 2007 Local Government Central http://www.ciwmb.ca.gov/LGCentral/ Larry N. Stephens: lstephen@ciwmb.ca.gov (916) 341-6241 |
|||