|
A Guide to the Revegetation and Environmental Restoration of Closed Landfills Chapter 13: Conclusion |
||
|
In the past 10 years, 122 landfills have closed in California. A closed landfill can be a valuable resource for future development and community use. Or, it can remain as an economic burden and an environmental deficit. This guide has reviewed a number of beneficial postclosure options: grassland, wooded wildlife preserve, official standard golf course, and office park. For revegetation or restoration projects to work, thorough analysis of soils, local environment and ecosystems, surface or topographic design, and grading and compatible vegetation selections are essential. Some important determinants for a successful project are listed below. Proper Advanced Planning Material Resources Advanced Research When exploring potential resources for the construction and eventual maintenance of the postclosure project, a preliminary study of the candidate resources and materials should be undertaken. Source water should be analyzed for harmful contaminants. The characteristics of the landfill (if it is an existing facility) need to be known or determined. Soils chemistry and potential for phytotoxic compounds in imported borrow material should be determined prior to importing, thus avoiding procuring useless material and resulting in wasted funding. Appropriate Revegetation Planning Extensive environmental restoration has been undertaken at three California landfills: Crescent City Landfill Del Norte County. This 170-acre site is located adjacent to, and surrounded on three sides by identified wetlands. Once a "burn dump", the site was certified closed in 1995. It is being restored with environmental restoration techniques. A man-made wetlands was created as part of the project. Coyote Canyon Landfill Orange County. This 300-acre site is located in canyon lands of the San Joaquin Hills near Newport Beach. The landfill impacts the habitat of the California Gnatcatcher (Polioptila californica). Extensive sage scrub habitat, which necessitated over 30-foot deep vegetative cover, was restored on the landfill site. South Miramar Landfill San Diego County. This 22-acre site is located in an area with identified vernal pools, as well as wetland, freshwater marsh, chamise chaparral, and ruderal (disturbed) vegetation. These projects are described in this author's paper provided at a workshop at Granlibakken in Tahoe City, California, in August 1998 (available at the IWMB Library). A discussion of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' role in permitting for landfills was included. Speakers at the workshop were: Crescent City Landfill Mr. Tom Hughes, LEA, Del Norte County Coyote Canyon Mr. Quang Nguyen, LEA, Orange County Ms. Lisa Woods, City of San Diego South Miramar Ms. Lisa Woods, City of San Diego Appendix 1: Potential Sources for Funding of Restoration Projects in California(Source: Yolo County Resources Conservation District) Partners for Wildlife Source: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service2800 Cottage Way W-2610 Sacramento, CA 95825 Contact: Ms. Debra Schlafmann or Mr. Dan Strait Telephone: (916) 414-6446 Challenge Cost/Share Program Source: U.S. Bureau of Land Management and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Conservation Reserve Program Source: Farm Service Agency Wildlife Habitat Incentive Program Source: Natural Resources Conservation Service Game Bird Heritage Program Source: California Department of Fish and Game Anadromous Fish Restoration Program Source: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Appendix 2: Nurseries Providing California Native Plants(Source: Yolo County Resources Conservation District) California Native Grasses Pacific Coast Seed S & S Seeds Hedgerow Farms Conservaseed Larger Native Plants (Trees and Shrubs) Los Angeles Moran Reforestation Center Magalia Nursery Cornflower Farms Table of ContentsResourcesFor additional copies of this guide and more information on revegetation, plant species, and other details of irrigation technology and application, please refer to the addresses below: Costello, L.R.; Jones, K.S.; WUCOLS, Water Use Classification of Landscape Species, 1994.
Guide to Vegetative Covers for California Landfills, 1994.
A Guide to the Revegetation and Environmental Restoration of Closed Landfills,1999.
Additional Resources Yolo County Resources Conservation District California Association of Resources Conservation Districts California Native Grass Association (CNGA) BibliographyBooks Cronquist, Arthur, Introductory Botany, Harper and Row Publishers, Inc., 49 East 43rd Street, New York, N.Y., 1971. Munz Philip A. and David D. Keck, A California Flora and Supplement, University of California Press, 1959. Duncan, Craig Thomas, "Guide to Vegetative Covers for California Landfills", Bryan A Stirrat, and Associates,1994. Berger, John J. (Ed.), Environmental Restoration, A compilation of papers, Island Press Suite 300,1718 Connecticut Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20009, 1990.
Conference Papers "Landfill Golf Course Developments," A collection of papers from the National Golf Foundation (NGF) Conference at Industry Hills, City of Industry, CA, November 12-14, 1995.
Papers Banuelos, G.S.; Cardon, G.; Mackey, B.; Ben-Asher, J.; Wu, L.; Beuselinck, P.; Akohoue, S.; Zambrzuski, S. "Plant and Environmental Interactions: Boron and Selenium Removal in Boron-Laden Soils by Four Sprinkler-Irrigated Plant Species." Carlson, Claire, L., "Environmental Impacts of Coal Combustion Residues," Bowling Green State University, Environmental Quality, Apr.-Jun., 1993, Vol. 22, n2, p.227. California Coastal Commission, "Procedural Guidance for the Review of Wetland Projects in California’s Coastal Zone," Chapter Two, An Overview of Mitigation Processes and Procedures, Feb 19, 1997. Costello, L.R.; Jones, K.S,, "Water Use Classification of Landscape Species," 1994. Gilman, Edward F.; Leone, Ida A.; Flower, Franklin B., "Critical Factors Controlling Vegetation Growth on Completed Sanitary Landfills," USEPA Report No.600/2-B1-164, Cook College, Rutgers University, Sept. 1981. Ghodrati, M.; Sims, J.T.; Vasilas, B.L., "Evaluation of Fly Ash as a Soil Amendment for the Atlantic Coastal Plain", Water, Air, Soil Pollution, 1995, Vol. 81, n3-4, pp.349-361. Harris-Pierce, R.L., "Effects on Runoff Water Quality in a Semiarid Grassland", Colorado State University, Environmental Quality, Jan.-Feb. 1995, Vol. 24, n1, p. 112. Invirotreat Inc.; "BKK Landfill Corp., Special Report: Evaluation of Treatment Options for Removal of TDS, Boron and Other Minerals From the Combined Effluent Stream of LTP and Power Plant" (undated). Landsburg Nova Corp., "The Use of Bottom Ash as a Physical Amendment to Sodic Spoil, Global Perspective Conference," Calgary, Canada, Aug. 27-31, 1989, Vol. 2, p. 505 (11). Licht, Louis; Madison, Mark; Lanier, Alicia. "Poplar Tree Technology Provides Cost and Management Advantages for Landfills," Oct. 1996. Parker, D.R.; Page, A.L.; Thomason, D.N., "Salinity and Boron Tolerances of Candidate Plants for the Removal of Selenium from Soils," Journal of Environmental Quality, V20:157-164, 1991. Peak, Michael T.; Thielen, David L., "Landform Contour Grading", Sukut Construction, Inc., Geoengineers, Inc. (undated). Perry and Associates Collaborative, "Class I Conceptual Landscape Plan, BKK Class I Landfill, West Covina, CA," June 17, 1996. Sajwan, K.S., Ornes.W. H., Youngblood, T., "Effect of Fly Ash/Sewage Sludge Mixtures and Application Rates on Biomass Production," Savannah St. College, Journal of Environmental Health, Part A, 1995, Vol. 30, nl6, pp. 1327-1337. SHN Consulting Engineers, "Report of Investigations Well/Spring Survey and Sampling, Louisiana Pacific's Caspar Woodwaste Disposal Site," 1993. Spain, Kathleen, "Get It Right at the Start," Waste Age, Feb, 1993. |
||
|
Last updated: April 18, 2008 LEA Support Services http://www.ciwmb.ca.gov/LEACentral/ Donnaye Palmer: donnayep@ciwmb.ca.gov (916) 341-6321 |